Bird v. State

by
In 1994, Appellant pled guilty to kidnapping and and first-degree sexual assault while he was on parole for an unrelated crime. Appellant was sentenced to two concurrent terms of life imprisonment. In 2014, Appellant, acting pro se, filed a second motion to correct illegal sentence. The district court awarded Appellant thirty-seven days of credit for presentence confinement and denied the remainder of Appellant’s claims. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district court did not err in denying Appellant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence under the circumstances of this case. View "Bird v. State" on Justia Law

Posted in: Criminal Law

Comments are closed.